space layout
Illuminating Spaces: Deep Reinforcement Learning and Laser-Wall Partitioning for Architectural Layout Generation
Kakooee, Reza, Dillenburger, Benjamin
Space layout design (SLD), occurring in the early stages of the design process, nonetheless influences both the functionality and aesthetics of the ultimate architectural outcome. The complexity of SLD necessitates innovative approaches to efficiently explore vast solution spaces. While image-based generative AI has emerged as a potential solution, they often rely on pixel-based space composition methods that lack intuitive representation of architectural processes. This paper leverages deep Reinforcement Learning (RL), as it offers a procedural approach that intuitively mimics the process of human designers. Effectively using RL for SLD requires an explorative space composing method to generate desirable design solutions. We introduce "laser-wall", a novel space partitioning method that conceptualizes walls as emitters of imaginary light beams to partition spaces. This approach bridges vector-based and pixel-based partitioning methods, offering both flexibility and exploratory power in generating diverse layouts. We present two planning strategies: one-shot planning, which generates entire layouts in a single pass, and dynamic planning, which allows for adaptive refinement by continuously transforming laser-walls. Additionally, we introduce on-light and off-light wall transformations for smooth and fast layout refinement, as well as identity-less and identity-full walls for versatile room assignment. We developed SpaceLayoutGym, an open-source OpenAI Gym compatible simulator for generating and evaluating space layouts. The RL agent processes the input design scenarios and generates solutions following a reward function that balances geometrical and topological requirements. Our results demonstrate that the RL-based laser-wall approach can generate diverse and functional space layouts that satisfy both geometric constraints and topological requirements and is architecturally intuitive.
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.14)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Delft (0.04)
- Research Report > Promising Solution (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.68)
Automated architectural space layout planning using a physics-inspired generative design framework
Li, Zhipeng, Li, Sichao, Hinchcliffe, Geoff, Maitless, Noam, Birbilis, Nick
During this stage, the foundational spatial arrangement is conceptualised, setting the stage for subsequent spatial interactions and functional efficacy. Typically, architects initiate the space layout design by creating rough sketches or diagrams to delineate the positions and interrelationships of distinct functional areas, subsequently refining these into multiple design solutions. The meticulous planning of space layout, which outlines the internal spaces' form, size, and circulation patterns, directly influences the building's operational performance and economic outlay [1, 2]. Layout planning is recognised as a wicked problem due to its inherent complexity and variability [3]. This complexity tends to escalate, presenting a compounded challenge for human designers as the scale and intricacies of the project increase. Computational design and design automation techniques have been utilised extensively within the realm of architecture, offering significant time savings by streamlining repetitive tasks and thereby enhancing designer productivity [4-7]. This efficiency has paved the way for these technologies to be integrated more deeply into architectural practices. Consequently, it is a natural progression to employ these automated techniques to assist designers in the repetitive or complex task of space layout planning in architecture. In recent years, generative design and automated generation of floorplans and space layout has garnered considerable interest, indicating a potential paradigm shift in design methodologies.
- Oceania > Australia (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.04)
- Asia > Singapore > Central Region > Singapore (0.04)
- Construction & Engineering (0.94)
- Energy (0.67)